Title: The Pitfalls of Lawyer's Reliance on ChatGPT: A Cautionary Tale As technology advances, artificial intelligence (AI) has become an increasingly popular tool in various industries, including law. Recently, a lawyer using the AI language model ChatGPT faced a disastrous outcome while representing a man who sued an airline. The man's case rested on the allegation of terrible customer service during his flight, but unfortunately, the AI failed to grasp the legal and factual nuances of the case. ChatGPT is a machine learning algorithm that can generate human-like text. It can help lawyers prepare legal documents, including motions and court pleadings. The AI's input can be helpful, but it should not replace a lawyer's professional judgment or reasoning. In the past few years, legal practitioners sought to explore the potential benefits of the AI, but it is crucial to remember that it has limitations. The experience faced by the man who sued the airline highlights the importance of lawyers understanding how ChatGPT works and its boundaries. The lawsuit filing was full of grammatical errors, unaligned statements, and ineffectively used legal terms to make claims. The court rejected the claims outright as it was unsupported by evidence and irrelevant to the facts at hand. The lawsuit was dismissed, and the plaintiff did not receive a favorable outcome, leading to frustration and disappointment. Ultimately, ChatGPT is a useful tool that can assist lawyers in their work; however, it should not be solely relied upon. The bot can identify relevant legal authority and assist in creating samples for legal documents, but it cannot provide legal advice or reason like a competent lawyer. Rather than depending solely on AI-generated output, lawyers should apply their legal analysis, expertise, and experience to protect their clients' interests. In conclusion, it is crucial to understand the limitations of using AI in law. While the technology has enormous potential to transform the industry, it should not take the place of human judgment and reasoning. Lawyers must balance the benefits of using AI with the responsibility to represent their clients effectively and competently. The cautionary tale of the airline case should remind us all that a poorly-prepared document can be damaging for clients and lawyers' professional reputation. A lawyer representing a man who sued an airline relied on artificial intelligence to help prepare a court filing. It did not go well.
![]()
